About Korvexia

Korvexia is dedicated to teaching verification without clutter. We focus on repeatable processes and transparent reasoning so learners can evaluate claims with confidence.

Mission

Our mission is to enable anyone to challenge, test, and validate information in the open. We teach clear thinking under pressure, emphasize traceable sourcing, and help learners communicate uncertainty responsibly.

Democratize verification literacy with approachable, evidence-first curricula.
Elevate judgment through structured practice, not memorized tricks.
Foster independence by exposing incentives, risks, and blind spots.

Methodology

We distill newsroom-grade workflows into simple steps and repeatable habits. Each lesson is paired with checklists, rubrics, and scenario-based drills.

Claim framing: clarify the verifiable core, scope, and implied assumptions.
Evidence mapping: enumerate sources, provenance, independence, and incentives.
Procedure design: specify tests, thresholds, and failure modes before collecting data.
Confidence grading: communicate strength of evidence and uncertainty with norms.

Principles

Transparency: Always cite sources, note limitations, and show the trail of evidence.
Proportionality: Weigh claims against the strength and independence of sources.
Consistency: Use structured checklists and documented workflows.

Milestones

Explore our journey. Expand items to see what changed and why.

Press ↑/↓ to navigate, → to expand, ← to collapse. Enter toggles completion.

Curriculum draft and pilot cohorts Q1

Designed scenarios mirroring real editorial pressure.
Removed jargon and enforced step-by-step clarity.
Collected feedback to tighten rubrics.

Mark complete

Expanded modules and assessments Q2

We introduced confidence levels, evidence weighting, and peer review rubrics.

Mark complete

Open verification checklists Q3

Reusable checklists to accelerate consistent practice.

Mark complete

Editorial integrity pledge Q4

A living pledge to maintain independence and disclose conflicts.

Mark complete

Ethical Pledge

We will not oversell certainty. We document uncertainty, encourage skepticism, and invite scrutiny. Learners are trained to present findings responsibly.

What we avoid

Sensational headlines that misrepresent evidence strength.
Cherry-picking sources or ignoring counterevidence.
Undisclosed conflicts of interest.

How we disclose

Document provenance, methods, and limitations for every exercise.
State confidence levels and reasoning steps plainly.
Invite independent replication and critique.

Team

We are a small group of editors, analysts, and educators who value calm, precise thinking. We keep roles fluid, but responsibilities clear.

Ari Lennox — Curriculum Lead

Designs drills and assessments; maintains open checklists.
Noah Kade — Verification Editor

Oversees sourcing standards and evidence weighting.
Mira Chen — Research Engineer

Builds tools to surface provenance and detect inconsistencies.
Jonas El — Program Manager

Coordinates pilots and learner feedback loops.